The Neutral Approach in Resolving Disputes in Religious Corporate Law

Cite as: 50 ATENEO L.J. 788 (2005)
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.




The Article examines the issue on resolving disputes in the area of Religious Corporate Law. The Article is divided into several parts. In the first part, the Author discusses the development of Religious Corporation as a private person. The second part discusses secularizing judicial approaches to religious property disputes such as the traditional non-entertainment of dispute, marginal review of the civil courts, and opening of doors. The third part concerns the discussion of jurisprudence involving religious corporate disputes such as the Islamic Directorate case, the Medlock v. Medlock case, and the Ang Mga Kaanib case.

In light of the analysis made by the Author, a strict application of corporate law principles must be maintained. The Author concludes that the State, the religious corporation, and individuals must structure relationships involving church property so as not to require civil courts to resolve ecclesiastical questions. Thus, there is a need to recognize what principles of corporate law may apply.

More Issues