Religion, Law and the State: Toleration, Non-preferentialism, and Equidistance

Cite as: 58 ATENEO L.J. 871 (2014)
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.


This Article traces the progress of the constitutional and normative doctrine of religious toleration. Following on the thought of the English jurist and philosopher John Locke, this Article traces that idea in its contemporary expressions in the United States legal and political thought. It takes a position against what may be termed the “liberal neutralist” position in favor of the constitutional and jurisprudential notion of nonpreferentialism.

Drawing together several diverse strands of thought and argument supportive of nonpreferentialism, including the Indian constitutional concept of equidistance, this Article seeks to go beyond legal or normative theory to sketch in preliminary fashion how non-preferentialism could be understood and applied in a variety of societies and under specific societal conditions.

More Issues