Watching the Watchers: A Look into the Drafting of the Writ of Amparo

Cite as: 52 Ateneo L.J. 665 (2007)
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.
Download

Author(s)
Categories

DOWNLOAD ABSTRACT:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dYEFtt_LvNQlOPl7xOABPBuOC0ydp0TR 

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YmEiKD_7ftVXseCinFl6AJkUtKpf1HTo 

 “What is the Writ of Amparo?” What started as a pernicious question boggling the minds of bar takers during the 1991 bar examinations has blossomed into a full-fledged rule striking fear in the hearts of perpetrators of extra-legal killings and enforced disappearances. But how exactly did this rule come about? What provided the impetus for its enactment? What were taken up during the deliberations of the Supreme Court Committee on the Revision of Rules?

This Article traces the development of the Philippine Writ of Amparo, as promulgated by the Supreme Court, and critically examines it as a measure to enforce constitutional rights. It explores the Rule on the Writ of Amparo from behind the scenes and explains the intent of the framers who drafted the Rule.

A peek into the discussions of the Justices present would show the comprehensive deliberations and the self-censorship and editing undertaken to create a holistically sound and constitutionally firm Rule that prods, but does not break, the separation of powers. 

More Issues