Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Issues in the Judiciary

Cite as: 52 Ateneo L.J. 545 (2007)
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.




The development of intellectual property (IP) law in the Philippines raises the question if there is a need for specialized IP courts. The Author, from a judicial perspective, answers in the affirmative. The benefits of having specialized IP courts arise in cases involving collection societies, copyright licensing, and royalty disputes.

Also from a judicial perspective on appropriate criminal sentencing, having specialized courts serves as deterrence, especially in cases involving willful trademark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale. Other factors may also be considered in imposing appropriate criminal sentences. The Author points to case studies and discusses the handling of IP cases by specialized courts, collection societies and criminal sentencing, and search and seizure motions.

The Author then undertakes a survey of recent significant decisions on IP-related issues in the Philippines touching on the question of jurisdiction, infringement of a registered trademark, a finding of no infringement of registered trademarks because of absence of evidence of actual use by trademark owners, a search warrant that was partially nullified, trademark dilution, bad faith use of a trademark, copyright infringement, and piracy.


More Issues