The Faces and Uses of the Political Questions Doctrine: Reflections on Habeas Corpus, the PCO, and Bail

Cite as: 28 ATENEO L.J. 1 (1983)
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.
Download

Author(s)
Categories

DOWNLOAD ABSTRACT:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=10YT7Oax2EPO8blU5MwOeBXImg-KyaM-K

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1LeJ5VuLWexMbEAV-qpAugBZVRfhgFoRm

In this Article, Father Bernas dissects the “political question vs. justiciability” doctrine in light of three things: (1) the habeas corpus decisions of the President under the Commander-in-Chief clause of the Constitution; (2) the Presidential Commitment Order (PCO); and (3) the right to bail. He mainly contends that based on the decisions of the Supreme Court on the above-matters, it is clear that an imperial presidency has been created. This presidency, he claims, is even more imperial than the American model. More concretely put, the Author posits that due to the proven tendency of the Judiciary to shy away from deciding apparently “political questions,” the presidency is rendered immune from checks and balances embodied in judicial review on the exercise of its powers.

More Issues