The Deterrence of Corporate Crime through Criminal and Administrative Liability

Cite as: 41 ATENEO L.J. 1 (1997).
Download Abstract Download Article
This publication contains material that is protected under International and Philippine Copyright Law and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this online publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the express written permission of the author as coursed through the Ateneo Law Journal.
Download

Author(s)
Categories

DOWNLOAD ABSTRACT:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1SBSpxoC5B_MjRjPQjL5iVxIbpUN2lMCT

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f-YwOi0JlskjmxgordYNbYeAyRnknkvK

This Article won the Best Thesis Award for Class ’96. The Author proceeds from the observation that though we have a civil and administrative system of holding corporations and its agents liable, the criminal aspect of corporate activity is sorely overlooked. The Author maintains the position that an evaluation of the system shows the inadequacy of the law in ensuring that the corporate offender is adequately punished. And even if an agent is punished, the corporation itself is insulated from the consequences of crime. The Article thus evaluates the twin aspect of corporate criminal liability and compares them to the existing system of criminal and administrative penalties. The Author posits that existing system of criminally penalizing responsible corporate officers should be maintained but must be more clearly defined. It must also be supplemented by a more effective system of administratively sanctioning the corporation. 

More Issues